page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22 page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100
page 101
page 102
page 103
page 104
page 105
page 106
page 107
page 108
page 109
page 110
page 111
page 112
page 113
page 114
page 115
page 116
page 117
page 118
page 119
page 120
page 121
page 122
page 123
page 124
page 125
page 126
page 127
page 128
page 129
page 130
page 131
page 132
page 133
page 134
< prev - next > Energy Biogas biogas plants in animal husbandry (Printable PDF)
There are two central demands to be placed on the stock-farming system in relation to biogas
utilization:
- permanent or part-time stabling or penning and
- proximity of the stables or pens to the place of gas utilization (usually the farmhouse).
If the distance between the stables/pens and the place of gas utilization is considerable, either the
substrate must be hauled to the biogas plant (extra work) or the gas must be transferred to the
place of use (cost of installing a supply pipe). Either of the two would probably doom the biogas
plant to failure. The best set of circumstances is given, when
- the animal excrements can flow directly into the biogas plant by exploiting a natural
gradient,
- the distance of flow is short, and
- the stables have a concrete floor to keep contamination like soil and sand from getting into
the plant while allowing collection of urine.
Cattle pens
Dung from earth-floor pens has a very high total-solids content (TS up to 60%), and the urine is lost.
Daily collection is tedious and there is no way to prevent sand from getting into the digester.
Consequently, at the same time a biogas plant is being installed, concrete floors should be installed
in such pens and provided with a collecting channel. This increases the total cost of the biogas
plant, but is usually justified, since it lowers the subsequent work input, helps ensure regular feeding
of the plant, reduces the chance of hoof disease and keeps sand and stones out of the digester.
The overall effect is to enhance acceptance of the biogas plant.
The collecting channels can be designed as open gutters or covered ducts. Concrete split tiles
serve well as construction material for the second (more expensive) version. The slots should be
about 2 - 3 cm wide, i.e. wide enough to let the dung pass through, but not wide enough to cause
injury to the animals.
Cattle dung dries rapidly in a hot climate, particularly if the pen has no roof. The cleaning water also
serves to liquefy the dung and reduce its TS content to 5-10%. for the purposes of fermentation.
The main advantage of this system is that the pens can be cleaned and the biogas plant filled in a
single operation. The collecting channel should be designed to yield a floating-manure system with
gates at the ends, so that a whole day's dung and cleaning water can collect at once. The
advantages:
- easy visual control of the daily substrate input,
- prevention of collecting-channel blockage due to dung sticking to the walls and drying out,
- adding the substrate at the warmest time of day, which can be very important in areas with
low nighttime temperatures.
Fig. 3.3: Pen with concrete floor and collecting
channel for dung and urine.
1. Water through, 2 Feeding through, 3 Collecting
channel, 4 Sand and rocks, 5 Concrete (Source:
OEKOTOP)
22