page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100
page 101
page 102
page 103
page 104
page 105
page 106
page 107
page 108
page 109
page 110
page 111
page 112 page 113
page 114
page 115
page 116
page 117
page 118
page 119
page 120
page 121
page 122
page 123
page 124
page 125
page 126
page 127
page 128
page 129
page 130
page 131
page 132
page 133
page 134
< prev - next > Energy Biogas biogas plants in animal husbandry (Printable PDF)
- The loans are not given directly to the beneficiary (plant owners), but channeled through a
biogas extension office.
- The office does not issue the loans in cash, but in the form of materials (cement, metal
gasholders, etc.).
- The material is issued on the basis of construction progress.
- Repayment of the loans is supervised by the biogas extension office with the assistance of the
aforementioned rural development bank.
- A loan guarantee fund into which, say, 10% of each granted loan is fed helps out in case of loan
arrears.
This model involves the following risks:
- The biogas extension office may be overburdened by the task of investigating creditability,
granting loans and helping to monitor repayment of the loans.
- The guarantee fund could dry up due to default on the part of the beneficiaries, or because the
loans were not properly calculated on a break-even basis (inflation, inadequate interest).
Such problems can be overcome in the medium-to-long term by establishing credit unions. That
process, though, demands lots of experience and can normally be expected to by far surpass the
project terms. Credit unions backed by the plant owners could gradually replace the development-
aid part of the lending program. Also, the credit unions could assume responsibility for the
aforementioned loan guarantee fund, thus gaining a say in the control of repayment. In most cases,
that would improve the lending program's reflux quota while helping to establish rural self-help
organizations - a goal that should be viewed as an implicit element of any biogas program.
10. Appendix
10.1 Design calculations and drawings
10.1.1 Floating-drum plants
Design calculation
Sizing factors
Daily substrate input, Sd
Retention time, RT
Daily gas production, G
Storage capacity,Cs
Digester volume, Vd
Gasholder volume, Vg
Example
= 115 l/d
= 70 days
= 2.5 m³/d
= 60%
= 8 m³
= 1.5 m³
112