page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100
page 101
page 102
page 103
page 104
page 105
page 106
page 107
page 108
page 109
page 110
page 111 page 112
page 113
page 114
page 115
page 116
page 117
page 118
page 119
page 120
page 121
page 122
page 123
page 124
page 125
page 126
page 127
page 128
page 129
page 130
page 131
page 132
page 133
page 134
< prev - next > Energy Biogas biogas plants in animal husbandry (Printable PDF)
Subsidies
The economic benefits of a biogas plant can be quite modest, e.g. when it serves as a substitute for
wood that can be gathered for free. The overall benefits, however, including such environmental
factors as the protection of forests, can be very substantial. Consequently, the user of the plant
should be eligible for subsidies to make up the difference. Such subsidies may consist of:
- contributions to the cost of construction in the form of needed materials (metal gasholder,
cement, fittings, etc.), such frequently scarce goods and materials also including those needed
for repairs and replacements, e.g. rustproofing for the gasholder,
- free planning and consulting
- assumption of interest debt on loans.
- On the whole, however, subsidies have the following drawbacks:
- Market prices can become distorted, and needed capital can be falsely invested.
- Subsidies intended explicitly for the needy may end up in the hands of well-todo groups.
In addition, prior project experience has shown that user motivation is frequently lower in the case
of heavily subsidized plants than in the case of plants that have been evaluated and built on a
commercial basis.
Loans
The monetary returns from a biogas plant, particularly those from a small family-size one, are often
meagre in comparison to the cost of investment. In other words, the plant hardly pays for itself in
terms of real income. Additionally, since most small farmers have no access to commercial loans,
but should not be expected to accept an excessive risk of indebtedness, it can be quite difficult to
arrange biogas-plant credit financing for that group of users. The following conditional factors
therefore should be investigated prior to setting up any particular credit program:
- first, check out all other funding alternatives, e.g. owned capital;
- then, conduct a detailed socioeconomic analysis of the target group and farms, e.g. which farm
can afford how much debt burden?;
- next, clarify the institutional tie-in, i.e. involvement of rural development banks or credit unions;
- and, lastly, establish the program quality, e.g. isolated or integrated credit programs, the latter
including technical and economic extension services, training, plant maintenance and repair.
If the appraisal shows that there is available within the region a credit program that is open to the
financing of biogas plants and would offer favorable conditions, e.g. a soft-loan program, then the
biogas program should rely on it. Establishing an independent credit program without the assistance
of an experienced institution is usually so complicated as to overtax an individual project.
A pragmatic loan-tendering model could be designed along the following lines:
- Development-aid funds are put in a time-deposit account at a rural development bank. The
bank agrees to provide loans amounting to several times the deposited amount for the purpose
of financing biogas plants.
111